Comparing COVID-19’s effect on urban vs. rural hospitals

comparing-covids-effect-on-urban-vs-rural-hospitals

While major metropolitan hospitals have been hit with the highest volumes of coronavirus patients, rural hospitals had been struggling financially since long before the viral outbreak hit its stride.

In March 2020, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) advised all U.S. hospitals to refuse elective procedures to focus on and preserve resources for COVID patients. While compliance was optional, this official recommendation was heeded by most facilities, and participating providers are now left feeling the financial impact. Elective procedures are a major source of income for hospitals, regardless of their location.

Here, we take a look at which regions (urban vs. rural) are facing the most adverse consequences from COVID-19.

How are urban hospitals affected by COVID-19?

The story of how hospitals have been affected financially by COVID-19 is one that has been front and center in the media since the virus first gained traction. Still, however, data for the virus’ financial impact on urban hospitals specifically is hard to come by. What we can determine is that major metropolitan areas like New York and New Jersey were hit first and hit the hardest.

Top 10 hospitals by COVID-19 diagnosis volume

RankDefinitive IDHospitalCityStateTotal diagnoses
12837Mount Sinai Medical CenterNew YorkNY16,615
22828Long Island Jewish Medical CenterNew Hyde ParkNY3,666
32824North Shore University HospitalManhassetNY2,630
42687Morristown Medical CenterMorristownNJ2,515
52888Good Samaritan HospitalSuffernNY2,347
61759Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical CenterBaton RougeLA2,289
72759St Barnabas HospitalBronxNY1,971
82689Ocean Medical CenterBrickNJ1,883
92913Southside HospitalBay ShoreNY1,831
102677JFK Medical CenterEdisonNJ1,680

Fig. 1 Data from the Definitive Healthcare Medical Claims database. Commercial claims data is sourced from multiple medical claims clearinghouses in the United States. Data is updated monthly. Accessed June 2020.

To get a better idea of the effects of COVID-19 on urban hospitals, we can use larger data sets for hospital financials in general and extrapolate to approximate financial losses for urban hospitals specifically.

How severe are urban hospital financial losses

The American Hospital Association (AHA) performed four analyses to quantify the financial challenges that hospitals have faced throughout the COVID-19 crisis:

  1. How COVID-19 hospitalizations affect hospital costs
  2. How cancelled and forgone services affect hospital revenue
  3. Additional costs associated with personal protective equipment
  4. What costs were accrued by hospitals offering additional support to their workers

These analyses indicated that, over the four-month period with the highest volume of coronavirus diagnoses (March – June 2020), hospitals have experienced a collective $202.6 billion financial loss, or an average loss of $50.7 billion per month.

The National Library of Medicine states that rural hospitals are generally smaller than urban hospitals — as much as one-third smaller by average bed count. With this in mind, we can assume that over two-thirds of the $202.6 billion loss suggested by the AHA belongs to urban hospitals. This implies that urban hospitals alone have suffered financial losses of approximately $133.7 billion.

How are rural hospitals affected by COVID-19?

Since 2010, 171 rural hospitals have been shut down and 453 other rural hospitals have been described as ‘vulnerable.’ The rural hospital has been an unstable institution for some time now, and for several reasons.

Only approximately 20 percent of the U.S. population lives in a rural area. This smaller portion of Americans is generally comprised of older individuals with higher rates of chronic conditions. This same population is also more likely to be under- or uninsured. The result is fewer, smaller hospitals treating higher volumes of sick patients with more unreliable insurance situations.

These rural hospitals may struggle to attract and retain physicians as well, so if even one doctor at a rural hospital contracts the coronavirus while treating ill patients, the effects can be devastating.

To make matters worse, these rural areas are often popular vacation spots. Rural hospital admins have reported seeing people from urban areas return to their vacation homes during the pandemic. This results in the further spreading of germs at a very sensitive time, and further strain on already limited rural hospital resources.

For rural hospitals, COVID-19 is making an already bad situation even worse. Any amount of additional financial loss could put the aforementioned 453 vulnerable hospitals in a near-critical state.

Urban vs. rural hospitals in the wake of COVID-19

While urban hospitals have certainly been through a lot these past few months, rural hospitals needed our attention even before these events took place. The point of this conversation is not to minimize the plights of urban hospitals, but to bring awareness to our rural areas which cannot stand to lose any more providers.

Definitive Healthcare

About the Author

Definitive Healthcare

This blog was written by a former contributor at Definitive Healthcare.At Definitive Healthcare, our passion is to transform data, analytics and expertise into healthcare…

Author profile